🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list included several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.