🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.